George Groves says he proved he is a world-class fighter during his controversial defeat against Carl Froch, who retained his super-middleweight titles after what seemed like a premature stoppage.Groves floored the rugged champion in the first round and dominated most of the fight before an abrupt ending in round nineVideo courtesy of iFL TVSee also:Heartbreak for Groves in world title clashFroch insists ref was right to stop fightPromoter predicts Froch-Groves rematchGroves: I’ll bounce back and be championGroves’ trainer reveals he had reservations about fight refereeFroch claims Groves rejected rematch offerFroch ordered to face Groves in rematchGroves to face Froch in rematch on 31 MayFroch-Groves rematch will be at WembleyGroves vows to avenge ‘stonewall robbery’YTo4OntzOjk6IndpZGdldF9pZCI7czoyMDoid3lzaWphLW5sLTEzNTI0NjE4NjkiO3M6NToibGlzdHMiO2E6MTp7aTowO3M6MToiMyI7fXM6MTA6Imxpc3RzX25hbWUiO2E6MTp7aTozO3M6MjI6Ildlc3QgTG9uZG9uIFNwb3J0IGxpc3QiO31zOjEyOiJhdXRvcmVnaXN0ZXIiO3M6MTc6Im5vdF9hdXRvX3JlZ2lzdGVyIjtzOjEyOiJsYWJlbHN3aXRoaW4iO3M6MTM6ImxhYmVsc193aXRoaW4iO3M6Njoic3VibWl0IjtzOjMzOiJTdWJzY3JpYmUgdG8gb3VyIGRhaWx5IG5ld3NsZXR0ZXIiO3M6Nzoic3VjY2VzcyI7czoyODM6IlRoYW5rIHlvdSEgUGxlYXNlIGNoZWNrIHlvdXIgaW5ib3ggaW4gb3JkZXIgdG8gY29uZmlybSB5b3VyIHN1YnNjcmlwdGlvbi4gSWYgeW91IGRvbid0IHNlZSBhbiBlLW1haWwgZnJvbSB1cywgY2hlY2sgeW91ciBzcGFtIGZvbGRlci4gSWYgeW91IHN0aWxsIGhhdmVuJ3QgcmVjZWl2ZWQgYSBjb25maXJtYXRpb24gbWVzc2FnZSwgcGxlYXNlIGUtbWFpbCBmZWVkYmFja0B3ZXN0bG9uZG9uc3BvcnQuY29tIGFuZCB0ZWxsIHVzIHlvdSB3aXNoIHRvIHN1YnNjcmliZSB0byBvdXIgbmV3c2xldHRlci4iO3M6MTI6ImN1c3RvbWZpZWxkcyI7YToxOntzOjU6ImVtYWlsIjthOjE6e3M6NToibGFiZWwiO3M6NToiRW1haWwiO319fQ== Follow West London Sport on TwitterFind us on Facebook
Click here if you’re unable to view the photo gallery on your mobile device. Antonio Brown says he is done playing in the NFL.The star wide receiver cited voided contracts as the reason for his apparent retirement. In the past 15 days, he’s been released by two teams and reportedly lost out on roughly $40 million.The Raiders reportedly voided a $29 million signing bonus guarantee to Brown after fining him for conduct detrimental to the team. ESPN reports that the Patriots are doing the same …
An important mathematical tool used by evolutionists has been discredited. To study life history evolution (i.e., the changes over time in a population’s reproductive age, maximum size, age at death, etc.) evolutionists have relied on Charnov’s concept of life history invariants. These invariants, which are “dimensionless ratios of two life history traits—for instance, age at maturity and average length of life,” according to Gerdien de Jong writing in Science,1 have been a staple of evolutionary models, providing generalizations “leading to an understanding of universal life history strategies.” Now, warns de Jong about work by Nee et al. in the same issue,2 the principal method of detecting life history invariants has been called into question. “The authors have determined that the approach is misleading, throwing the very existence of the concept into doubt.” (Emphasis added in all quotes.) Ratios can fall on a straight line when plotted, suggesting a mathematical relationship, but Nee et al. have demonstrated that the relationships are figments of the method and not necessarily real. The same data plotted between groups of animals might yield a straight line, for instance, but when plotted within isolated groups of animals can yield lines offset from one another. “The regression analysis is therefore misleading,” de Jong says. The same problem can exist within other biological models. Are the patterns real, therefore, or contrived? Are they meaningful in evolutionary terms?Life history evolution is not the only field where invariants or universal constants are proposed. The Universal Temperature Dependence of metabolism proposal asserts that the metabolism of all organisms can be described by a single equation. Scaling laws (as, for instance, basic metabolic rate scale as mass to the power 3/4) are called universal over all life. This hankering for universal explanations has been criticized not only on technical grounds but also for ignoring biology and the variation between organisms. Interesting biology might not be in life history invariants but in biological variation.De Jong illustrates, for example, that two species of fish in the same habitat can have completely different ratios of sex to social rank. De Jong doesn’t go so far as to argue that it is a waste of time to look for mathematical relationships in biology, just that “We should be wary of treating an average across species as an explanatory general life history invariant.”1Gerdien de Jong, “Evolution: Is Invariance Across Animal Species Just an Illusion?”, Science, Vol 309, Issue 5738, 1193-1195, 19 August 2005, [DOI: 10.1126/science.1117591].2Nee et al., “The Illusion of Invariant Quantities in Life Histories,” Science, 2005 309: 1236-1239.Evolutionists desperately want their theories to be considered scientific, but the language of science is mathematics. They should recall the difference between the hard sciences and biology, as expressed by the Harvard Law: “Under the most rigorously controlled conditions of pressure, temperature, volume, humidity, and other variables, the organism will do as it *@#&! well pleases.” The deception is even worse when evolutionary psychologists measure human behavior according to Koestler’s Ratomorphic Fallacy, treating people like lab rats, or when they try to describe altruism, whether in humans or bacteria, in terms of the equations of game theory. One of the ugliest of recent examples involved anthropologists trying to measure the evolution of anti-Semitism (see 07/19/2005). Read the quote at the top right of this page again. Is there anything in evolutionary biology that even comes close to Kepler’s Laws or Newton’s Laws in generality and formal structure? Scientific research papers on evolution often contain equations, formulas, and graphs (e.g., 07/21/2005), but if even some of the most basic observable ratios of characteristics between present-day animals can produce misleading relationships, why should anyone trust relationships inferred between dead things lost in imaginary evolutionary prehistory? If the “interesting biology” lies in variation, no pattern of evolution can be rigorously inferred. Thus, evolutionists in their formalisms commit the fallacy of statistics, fooling and being fooled.(Visited 6 times, 1 visits today)FacebookTwitterPinterestSave分享0
SummaryReviewer Nathalie DuboisReview Date2019-06-01 00:37:35Reviewed Item MyArmor Elegant 2 Layer Cathedral Elbow Length Bride Wedding Bridal Veil With Comb & Ribbon Edge (White)Rating 4.2 / 5 stars, based on 38 reviews Posted on June 1, 2019Author Nathalie DuboisCategories Hair PinsTags MyArmor Costume Arrived the next day just using standard post. Absolutely exactly what was wanted. Good quality at a great price. Brilliant i never thought i would be nice but when it arrived i was chuffed recoment this to everyone the price was good and service fantastic arrived before the date. I bought this for amateur dramatics. Veil dropped out well with a quick steam from a hand-held steamer. Nice material, speedy delivery. Brought as part of a costume. I would personally use it for my actual wedding as my friends purchased near enough the same one for £75. Features of MyArmor Elegant 2 Layer Cathedral Elbow Length Bride Wedding Bridal Veil With Comb & Ribbon Edge (White)Material: Grenadine/Comb Material: Plastic2 Colors available: White, Ivory, comes with a combTotal Length: 150 cm-First layer 65 cm/Second layer 85 cm Width: 125 cmWeight: 50gPerfect for weddings, costume, dress-up, etc.Material: Grenadine/Comb Material: Plastic Perfect for my big day thankyou. Material feels little bit cheap (as it is cheap) but looks amazing. Can’t complain for this price. I’m very happy with my purchase. Surprised by the quality of this veil. It holds very well and is really lovely looking. Very nice veil only thing wrong was when it came it was white instead of ivory said ivory on packet but it’s definitely white. This veil is nice didnt expect it to be for the price. Veil as expected tho comb was broken on arrival. 2 Colors available: White, Ivory, comes with a comb Is what it says it is, plain, simple and decent quality. A bit disappointed with the colour as ordered the ivory and it is still a little on the white side. Did the job for some fancy dress. Nice,but my daughter need longer one. Very good exactly what is advertised thankyou. Pretty good for the price i paid. Total Length: 150 cm-First layer 65 cm/Second layer 85 cm Width: 125 cm Weight: 50g Five Stars I bought this to add to my halloween costume and it was perfect for the occasion. It was long enough to cover my face and it was well made. Came next day lovely veil saved the day 👍🏼. Wasn’t due to be delivered for 2 more days arrived today and i was buzzing looks as does in picture :). Bought for my friends hen do. Not sure if it’s ivory enough til try it with dress but for the price definitely worth it. Omf ordered friday came daturday what can i say excellent delivery super quisk service veil perfect exactly as described my daighter is over the moon would reccomend this company to any one i have no negative comments to add u are just perfect will so buy again from u xxxx. Lovely surprise Perfect for weddings, costume, dress-up, etc.